tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3417186274715068618.post7816939566299959198..comments2023-10-31T06:20:18.423-04:00Comments on Vintage Sportscards: A Little Prespective on Hall of Fame "Stats"Chris Stufflestreethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04229983444919282224noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3417186274715068618.post-87368472540636255612012-01-07T23:15:55.638-05:002012-01-07T23:15:55.638-05:00The point of my post wasn't to question whethe...The point of my post wasn't to question whether Santo should have been elected to the Hall of Fame. Actually, I quit caring about who got in or didn't a long time ago. I just thought it was interesting that a player considered the most dominating of his era had never even had a career W/L average above .500 at the halfway point in his career. <br /><br />If I were a kid in 1961, I'd probably consider him to be an underachiever...a lot of potential but not a lot of actual proof.Chris Stufflestreethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04229983444919282224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3417186274715068618.post-8908732862368420152012-01-07T00:10:00.726-05:002012-01-07T00:10:00.726-05:00Put Garvey in the HOF-more consistent, more record...Put Garvey in the HOF-more consistent, more records held and what he did for the Pads in 84? Don Sutton got in. If Santo is a HOFer than you gotta start adding guys like Rusty Staub, Boog Powell and Dave Parker. Heck, Carney Lansford was a good third baseman and a better hitter than Santo too...should he be in the Hall?OCDQhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11960159221421132957noreply@blogger.com